STATISTICS OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES AS A TOOL FOR RISK DETECTION IN CLINICAL RESEARCH PROJECTS

Keywords: project management, risk management, risk identification, changes, communication

Abstract

The article is dedicated to studying the problem of early risk identification in clinical research projects. The main objective of the study is to find an accessible, reliable, and verifiable method for early risk identification to plan for risks at the early stages of a project, aiming to prevent the occurrence of risks with negative consequences or to mitigate these negative consequences if they arise during the project. The article employed methods of synergetic, comparative analysis, synergetic meta-analysis. The article examines various sources, scientific works by experts in the field of studying and the impact of trends, reforms, practices, and strategies on the economic efficiency and quality of new drug development, e.g., patients` recruitment, patients `retention, clinical project management, patient outsourcing, clinical data collection, regulatory matters in terms of I – IV protocol design strategies. One of the significant aspects explored in the article is the trend in submitting substantial regulatory amendments over the past 12 years. The main result and scientific novelty of the research includes demonstrating the relationship between protocol submissions and the risk events that led to the need for changes, which, in turn, allows project management team to identify a primary risk using information of substantial amendment from the beginning of the clinical trial project. By effectively communicating these risks, decision-makers can incorporate them into their business strategies and make well-informed choices that account for potential challenges. A supplementary advantage of this method is its accessibility. The necessary information can be easily obtained from open sources, including official regulatory agency websites. It is proposed that this information be utilized for an initial risk assessment, followed by the development of a structured register for systematic early risk identification. Implementing such a system will empower project teams within biopharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations to enhance their planning processes, optimize budgets, and establish more accurate timelines for clinical trial projects across various phases. This, in turn, will contribute to more efficient resource allocation, improved project execution, and a higher likelihood of successful clinical research outcomes.

References

Carozza, D. Avoiding the avoidable in clinical trials. Forbes. URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/medidata/2016/03/02/avoiding-the-avoidable-in-clinical-trials/ (дата звернення: 09.02.2025).

Getz K. Acknowledging cycle time impact from protocol amendments. Applied Clinical Trials. 2016. Vol. 25, № 4. URL: https://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/acknowledging-cycle-time-impact-protocol-amendments (дата звернення: 05.02.2025).

Getz, K. Shining a light on the inefficiencies in amendment implementation. Applied Clinical Trials. 2023. Vol. 32, № 12. URL: https://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/shining-a-light-on-the-inefficiencies-in-amendment-implementation (дата звернення: 05.02.2025).

Getz, K. A., Stergiopoulos, S., Short, M., Surgeon, L., Krauss, R., Pretorius, S., Desmond, J., & Dunn, D. The impact of protocol amendments on clinical trial performance and cost. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science. 2016. Vol. 50, № 4. P. 436–441.

Getz, K., Smith, Z., Botto, E., Murphy, E., & Dauchy, A. New benchmarks on protocol amendment practices, trends and their impact on clinical trial performance. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science. 2024. Vol. 58, № 3. P. 539–548.

Good Clinical Practice Guide. Great Britain Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. 2012. 542 p.

Grgurević, D. Overview of risk management tools and methods. International Journal for Quality Research. 2023. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 209–218.

International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH harmonised guideline: Integrated addendum to ICH E6(R1): Guideline for good clinical practice E6(R2). 2016. URL: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-guideline-good-clinical-practice-e6r2-step-5_en.pdf (дата звернення: 05.02.2025).

Joshi, S. Common clinical trial amendments, why they are submitted and how they can be avoided: A mixed methods study on NHS UK Sponsored Research (Amendments Assemble). Trials. 2023. Vol. 24. P. 1–14.

Miessler, J. Protocol amendments continue to increase, report shows. 2023. URL: https://www.centerwatch.com/articles/26488-protocol-amendments-continue-to-increase-report-shows (дата звернення: 07.02.2025).

Risk management – Risk assessment techniques. IEC31010:2019. Official site of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). URL: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:iec:31010:ed-2:v1:en,fr (дата звернення: 09.02.2025).

Suna, D., et al. Why 90% of clinical drug development fails and how to improve it? Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2022. Vol. 12, № 7. P. 3049–3062.

Перелік протоколів клінічних випробувань лікарських засобів, рекомендованих до затвердження МОЗ. Державний експертний центр. URL: https://www.dec.gov.ua/applicant/perelik-protokoliv-klinichnyh-vyprobuvan-likarskyh-zasobiv-rekomendovanyh-do-zatverdzhennya-moz/?role=applicant (дата звернення: 09.02.2025).

Стандарт з управління проєктами та Настанова до зводу знань з управління проєктами (Настанова PMBOK): сьоме видання. Project Management Institute (PMI). 2021. 370 с.

Carozza, D. (2016). Avoiding the avoidable in clinical trials. Forbes. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/medidata/2016/03/02/avoiding-the-avoidable-in-clinical-trials/

Getz K. (2016). Acknowledging cycle time impact from protocol amendments. Applied Clinical Trials, 25 (4). Available at: https://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/acknowledging-cycle-time-impact-protocol-amendments (accessed: 05.02.2025).

Getz, K. (2023). Shining a light on the inefficiencies in amendment implementation. Applied Clinical Trials, 32(12). Available at: https://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/shining-a-light-on-the-inefficiencies-in-amendment-implementation

Getz, K. A., Stergiopoulos, S., Short, M., Surgeon, L., Krauss, R., Pretorius, S., Desmond, J., & Dunn, D. (2016). The impact of protocol amendments on clinical trial performance and cost. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 50(4), 436–441.

Getz, K., Smith, Z., Botto, E., Murphy, E., & Dauchy, A. (2024). New benchmarks on protocol amendment practices, trends and their impact on clinical trial performance. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 58(3), 539–548.

Good Clinical Practice Guide (2012). Great Britain Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency.

Grgurević, D. (2023). Overview of risk management tools and methods. International Journal for Quality Research, 18(1), 209–218.

International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (2016). ICH harmonised guideline: Integrated addendum to ICH E6(R1): Guideline for good clinical practice E6(R2). Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-guideline-good-clinical-practice-e6r2-step-5_en.pdf

Joshi, S. (2023). Common clinical trial amendments, why they are submitted and how they can be avoided: A mixed methods study on NHS UK sponsored research (Amendments Assemble). Trials, 24(1).

Miessler, J. (2023). Protocol amendments continue to increase, report shows. CenterWatch. Available at: https://www.centerwatch.com/articles/26488-protocol-amendments-continue-to-increase-report-shows

Risk management – Risk assessment techniques. (2019). IEC31010:2019. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Available at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:iec:31010:ed-2:v1:en,fr

Suna, D., et al. (2022). Why 90% of clinical drug development fails and how to improve it? Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, 12(7), 3049–3062.

Perelik protokoliv klinichnykh vyprobuvanʹ likarsʹkykh zasobiv, rekomendovanykh do zatverdzhennya MOZ. Derzhavnyy ekspertnyy tsentr. [List of clinical trial protocols for medicinal products recommended for approval by the Ministry of Health. State Expert Center]. Available at: https://www.dec.gov.ua/applicant/perelik-protokoliv-klinichnyh-vyprobuvan-likarskyh-zasobiv-rekomendovanyh-do-zatverdzhennya-moz/?role=applicant

Project Management Institute (2021). Standart z upravlinnya proyektamy ta Nastanova do zvodu znan z upravlinnya proyektamy (Nastanova PMBOK): some vydannya [A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (7th ed.)].

Article views: 39
PDF Downloads: 48
Published
2025-03-07
How to Cite
Amrakhov, P. (2025). STATISTICS OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES AS A TOOL FOR RISK DETECTION IN CLINICAL RESEARCH PROJECTS. Kyiv Economic Scientific Journal, (8), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-765X/2025-8-1
Section
SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES